Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WLGAX
FFAFX vs WLGAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.08
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund A
Price$39.39
Change-$0.67 (-1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.93B
FFAFX vs WLGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WLGAX (7.93B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGAX: FFAFX (0.53) vs WLGAX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WLGAX (25 years). WLGAX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGAX (18.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGAX: FFAFX (250) vs WLGAX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. WLGAX (6.34). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. WLGAX (34.70).
| FFAFX | WLGAX | FFAFX / WLGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.89 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.97 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.987 | 10.237 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 7.93B | 4,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 6.34 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 53.08 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.09 | 34.70 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 109.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers