Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs URNQX
FFAFX vs URNQX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs URNQX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.44
Change+$0.08 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Victory Nasdaq 100 Index R6
Price$63.23
Change-$0.06 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.36B
FFAFX vs URNQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. URNQX (8.36B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than URNQX: FFAFX (0.54) vs URNQX (0.42). FFAFX was incepted earlier than URNQX: FFAFX (5 years) vs URNQX (9 years). FFAFX (0.35) is less costly to investors than URNQX (0.29). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. URNQX (8.00). URNQX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: URNQX (0) vs FFAFX (250). URNQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.59 vs. FFAFX (7.12). URNQX return over 5 years is better than : 84.44 vs. FFAFX (34.98).
| FFAFX | URNQX | FFAFX / URNQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.29 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.29 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.539 | 22.278 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 8.36B | 4,054% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.42 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.12 | 17.59 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.22 | 105.07 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.98 | 84.44 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |