Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs TRIHX
FFAFX vs TRIHX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs TRIHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$88.57
Change-$1.38 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx I
Price$75.48
Change-$4.56 (-5.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.31B
FFAFX vs TRIHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. TRIHX (18.3B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than TRIHX: FFAFX (0.54) vs TRIHX (0.40). FFAFX was incepted earlier than TRIHX: FFAFX (5 years) vs TRIHX (10 years). FFAFX (0.34) is less costly to investors than TRIHX (0.16). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TRIHX (27.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIHX: FFAFX (250) vs TRIHX (100000). TRIHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.73 vs. FFAFX (7.13). TRIHX return over 5 years is better than : 71.94 vs. FFAFX (36.35).
| FFAFX | TRIHX | FFAFX / TRIHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.16 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.16 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.226 | 19.749 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 18.3B | 1,852% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.40 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | 15.73 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.89 | 106.82 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.35 | 71.94 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 290.93 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement