Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs TCPWX
FFAFX vs TCPWX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs TCPWX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$84.20
Change+$0.28 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Transamerica Capital Growth R6
Price$13.62
Change+$0.13 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.61B
FFAFX vs TCPWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. TCPWX (1.61B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than TCPWX: FFAFX (0.58) vs TCPWX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than TCPWX: FFAFX (5 years) vs TCPWX (6 years). TCPWX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TCPWX (20.00). TCPWX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: TCPWX (0) vs FFAFX (250). TCPWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 74.62 vs. FFAFX (18.10).
| FFAFX | TCPWX | FFAFX / TCPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.74 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.74 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.477 | 20.318 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 1.61B | 20,373% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.10 | 74.62 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.41 | 126.25 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -27.44 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement