Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs TCPWX
FFAFX vs TCPWX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs TCPWX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$78.04
Change-$0.95 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
Transamerica Capital Growth R6
Price$12.67
Change-$0.10 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
FFAFX vs TCPWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. TCPWX (1.5B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than TCPWX: FFAFX (0.62) vs TCPWX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than TCPWX: FFAFX (5 years) vs TCPWX (6 years). TCPWX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TCPWX (20.00). TCPWX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: TCPWX (0) vs FFAFX (250). TCPWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 66.93 vs. FFAFX (7.56).
| FFAFX | TCPWX | FFAFX / TCPWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.74 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.74 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.175 | 11.926 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 1.5B | 20,414% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 66.93 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.31 | 135.94 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -21.01 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement