Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs SBRAX
FFAFX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBRAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.08
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Ret
Price$20.94
Change-$0.31 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.97M
FFAFX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. SBRAX (87M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBRAX: FFAFX (0.53) vs SBRAX (0.19). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs SBRAX (6 years). SBRAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). SBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. SBRAX (-11.28). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. SBRAX (4.67).
| FFAFX | SBRAX | FFAFX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.99 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.56 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.987 | 8.974 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 87M | 390,805% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.19 | 276% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | -11.28 | -82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 7.03 | 954% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.09 | 4.67 | 923% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |