Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs SBRAX
FFAFX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBRAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$79.38
Change-$9.63 (-10.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Ret
Price$16.56
Change-$4.30 (-20.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.81M
FFAFX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. SBRAX (65.8M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBRAX: FFAFX (0.48) vs SBRAX (0.04). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs SBRAX (6 years). SBRAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SBRAX (27.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.01 vs. SBRAX (-17.90). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.47 vs. SBRAX (-23.35).
| FFAFX | SBRAX | FFAFX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.99 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.56 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.985 | 1.346 | -73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 65.8M | 510,638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.04 | 1,247% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | -17.90 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.16 | -13.33 | -346% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.47 | -23.35 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement