Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs SBHAX
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$82.60
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$20.24
Change+$0.20 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.65M
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. SBHAX (94.6M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: FFAFX (0.58) vs SBHAX (0.21). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). SBHAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.18 vs. SBHAX (-8.31).
| FFAFX | SBHAX | FFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.84 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.93 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.321 | 3.635 | 311% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 94.6M | 341,438% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.21 | 275% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.18 | -8.31 | -135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.65 | 5.92 | 1,041% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 17.25 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement