Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs SBHAX
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$81.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$16.58
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.75M
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. SBHAX (78.7M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: FFAFX (0.54) vs SBHAX (0.20). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). SBHAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SBHAX (27.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.90 vs. SBHAX (-16.93). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.65 vs. SBHAX (-19.79).
| FFAFX | SBHAX | FFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.84 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.93 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.272 | -15.105 | -61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 78.7M | 430,750% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.20 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.90 | -16.93 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.66 | -8.17 | -816% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.65 | -19.79 | -125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement