Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs SBHAX
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$21.24
Change+$0.08 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.58M
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. SBHAX (84.6M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: FFAFX (0.54) vs SBHAX (0.20). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). SBHAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. SBHAX (-12.30). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.86 vs. SBHAX (2.44).
| FFAFX | SBHAX | FFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.84 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.93 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.431 | 8.756 | 233% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 84.6M | 400,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.20 | 268% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | -12.30 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.39 | 4.10 | 1,594% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.86 | 2.44 | 1,432% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 75.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement