Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs SBHAX
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$79.38
Change-$9.63 (-10.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$16.60
Change-$4.31 (-20.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.81M
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. SBHAX (65.8M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: FFAFX (0.48) vs SBHAX (0.05). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs SBHAX (13 years). SBHAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. SBHAX (27.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.01 vs. SBHAX (-17.81). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.47 vs. SBHAX (-23.16).
| FFAFX | SBHAX | FFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.84 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.93 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.985 | 1.405 | -70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 65.8M | 510,638% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.05 | 901% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | -17.81 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.16 | -13.15 | -351% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.47 | -23.16 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement