Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs SBHAX
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs SBHAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.08
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
Price$20.99
Change-$0.31 (-1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets86.97M
FFAFX vs SBHAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. SBHAX (87M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than SBHAX: FFAFX (0.53) vs SBHAX (0.20). FFAFX was incepted earlier than SBHAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs SBHAX (12 years). SBHAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). SBHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBHAX: FFAFX (250) vs SBHAX (250000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. SBHAX (-11.21). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.96 vs. SBHAX (4.87).
| FFAFX | SBHAX | FFAFX / SBHAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.84 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.93 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.358 | 9.063 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 87M | 390,805% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.20 | 265% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | -11.21 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.28 | 7.25 | 900% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.96 | 4.87 | 820% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement