Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs RSGRX
FFAFX vs RSGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RSGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$88.83
Change+$0.38 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
FFAFX vs RSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. RSGRX (383M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RSGRX: FFAFX (0.54) vs RSGRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RSGRX: FFAFX (5 years) vs RSGRX (34 years). RSGRX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). RSGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSGRX: FFAFX (250) vs RSGRX (2500). RSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.42 vs. FFAFX (7.34). RSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 45.51 vs. FFAFX (34.69).
| FFAFX | RSGRX | FFAFX / RSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.10 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.17 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 18.244 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 383M | 88,773% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 9.42 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.71 | 92.36 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.69 | 45.51 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement