Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs RMBHX
FFAFX vs RMBHX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RMBHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.08
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
FFAFX vs RMBHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. RMBHX (119M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RMBHX: FFAFX (0.53) vs RMBHX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RMBHX: FFAFX (5 years) vs RMBHX (50 years). RMBHX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMBHX (10.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBHX: FFAFX (250) vs RMBHX (2500). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. RMBHX (1.35). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. RMBHX (22.98).
| FFAFX | RMBHX | FFAFX / RMBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.24 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.24 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 50 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.987 | 10.668 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 119M | 285,714% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 1.35 | 681% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 24.18 | 277% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.09 | 22.98 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement