Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs RDLCX
FFAFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$79.38
Change-$9.63 (-10.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$9.60
Change-$1.14 (-10.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.04M
FFAFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. RDLCX (301M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: FFAFX (0.48) vs RDLCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs RDLCX (19 years). RDLCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FFAFX (32.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: FFAFX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). FFAFX (3.01) and RDLCX (3.00) have marching annual gain over last year. FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.47 vs. RDLCX (-5.33).
| FFAFX | RDLCX | FFAFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.81 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.90 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.985 | -2.736 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 301M | 111,628% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | 3.00 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.16 | 40.15 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.47 | -5.33 | -291% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 34.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers