Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs RDLCX
FFAFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$84.27
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$9.92
Change+$0.04 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.04M
FFAFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. RDLCX (295M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: FFAFX (0.58) vs RDLCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: FFAFX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.96 vs. RDLCX (6.21).
| FFAFX | RDLCX | FFAFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.81 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.92 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.571 | 7.709 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 295M | 111,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.96 | 6.21 | 273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.96 | 23.85 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 4.42 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement