Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs RDLCX
FFAFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.71
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$10.55
Change+$0.05 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308.94M
FFAFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. RDLCX (309M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: FFAFX (0.55) vs RDLCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: FFAFX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.90 vs. RDLCX (5.61).
| FFAFX | RDLCX | FFAFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.81 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.92 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.208 | 14.549 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 309M | 108,738% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.90 | 5.61 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.42 | 49.65 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 1.93 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement