Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs RDLAX
FFAFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$84.20
Change+$0.28 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$11.62
Change+$0.07 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.04M
FFAFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. RDLAX (295M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: FFAFX (0.58) vs RDLAX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs RDLAX (18 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: FFAFX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.10 vs. RDLAX (9.01).
| FFAFX | RDLAX | FFAFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.06 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.17 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.477 | 7.792 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 295M | 111,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.10 | 9.01 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.41 | 38.66 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 16.32 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement