Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs RBCGX
FFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$84.27
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$75.90
Change+$0.33 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.26M
FFAFX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. RBCGX (76.3M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RBCGX: FFAFX (0.58) vs RBCGX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: FFAFX (5 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: FFAFX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.34 vs. FFAFX (16.96).
| FFAFX | RBCGX | FFAFX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.01 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.01 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.571 | 12.561 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 76.3M | 429,882% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.96 | 21.34 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.96 | 50.92 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.23 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 20.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement