Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs NWZMX
FFAFX vs NWZMX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWZMX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$82.60
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6
Price$21.21
Change+$0.20 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.15M
FFAFX vs NWZMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NWZMX (213M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: FFAFX (0.58) vs NWZMX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWZMX: FFAFX (5 years) vs NWZMX (8 years). NWZMX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZMX (8.16). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: FFAFX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). NWZMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.58 vs. FFAFX (11.18).
| FFAFX | NWZMX | FFAFX / NWZMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.82 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.321 | 10.067 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 213M | 151,643% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.18 | 12.58 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.65 | 70.50 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 46.99 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement