Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs NWZMX
FFAFX vs NWZMX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWZMX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$84.20
Change+$0.28 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6
Price$21.45
Change+$0.10 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets215.48M
FFAFX vs NWZMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWZMX (215M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: FFAFX (0.58) vs NWZMX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWZMX: FFAFX (5 years) vs NWZMX (8 years). NWZMX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZMX (8.16). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: FFAFX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). NWZMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.98 vs. FFAFX (18.10).
| FFAFX | NWZMX | FFAFX / NWZMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.82 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.91 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.477 | 11.313 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 215M | 152,558% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.10 | 20.98 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.41 | 65.51 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 45.42 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement