Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs NWZLX
FFAFX vs NWZLX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWZLX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$82.60
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$20.37
Change+$0.19 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.15M
FFAFX vs NWZLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NWZLX (213M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: FFAFX (0.58) vs NWZLX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWZLX: FFAFX (5 years) vs NWZLX (8 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: FFAFX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). NWZLX (11.74) and FFAFX (11.18) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FFAFX | NWZLX | FFAFX / NWZLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.27 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.36 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.321 | 9.811 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 213M | 151,643% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.18 | 11.74 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.65 | 67.10 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 42.35 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement