Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs NWZLX
FFAFX vs NWZLX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWZLX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$84.20
Change+$0.28 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$20.59
Change+$0.10 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets215.48M
FFAFX vs NWZLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. NWZLX (215M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: FFAFX (0.58) vs NWZLX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWZLX: FFAFX (5 years) vs NWZLX (8 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: FFAFX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). NWZLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.06 vs. FFAFX (18.10).
| FFAFX | NWZLX | FFAFX / NWZLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.27 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.36 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.477 | 10.997 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 215M | 152,558% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.10 | 20.06 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.41 | 62.13 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 40.83 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement