Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs NWAUX
FFAFX vs NWAUX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWAUX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nationwide GQG US Quality Eq A
Price$14.16
Change-$0.05 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.21M
FFAFX vs NWAUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NWAUX (252M). NWAUX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: NWAUX (1.15) vs FFAFX (0.54). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWAUX: FFAFX (5 years) vs NWAUX (5 years). NWAUX (1.11) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). NWAUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 217.11 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWAUX: FFAFX (250) vs NWAUX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. NWAUX (-21.42).
| FFAFX | NWAUX | FFAFX / NWAUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.99 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.11 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.431 | -5.468 | -374% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 252M | 134,524% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.15 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | -21.42 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.39 | 23.86 | 274% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.86 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement