Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs NWADX
FFAFX vs NWADX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWADX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.08
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$21.61
Change-$0.50 (-2.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets218.4M
FFAFX vs NWADX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NWADX (218M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than NWADX: FFAFX (0.53) vs NWADX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWADX: FFAFX (5 years) vs NWADX (7 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: FFAFX (250) vs NWADX (50000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. NWADX (5.09). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. NWADX (35.98).
| FFAFX | NWADX | FFAFX / NWADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.92 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.01 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.987 | 15.397 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 218M | 155,963% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 5.09 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 66.99 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.09 | 35.98 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement