Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs NWADX
FFAFX vs NWADX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWADX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$78.04
Change-$0.95 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$19.94
Change-$0.16 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.82M
FFAFX vs NWADX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. NWADX (200M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than NWADX: FFAFX (0.62) vs NWADX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWADX: FFAFX (5 years) vs NWADX (7 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: FFAFX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.27 vs. FFAFX (7.56).
| FFAFX | NWADX | FFAFX / NWADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.92 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.01 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.175 | 4.071 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 200M | 155,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 12.27 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.31 | 67.56 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 44.70 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement