Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs MSHPX
FFAFX vs MSHPX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MSHPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$82.60
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$15.50
Change+$0.10 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.57M
FFAFX vs MSHPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. MSHPX (5.57M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: MSHPX (2.22) vs FFAFX (0.58). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHPX: FFAFX (5 years) vs MSHPX (5 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: FFAFX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). MSHPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.05 vs. FFAFX (11.18).
| FFAFX | MSHPX | FFAFX / MSHPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.80 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 10.50 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.321 | 21.094 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 5.57M | 5,795,801% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 2.22 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.18 | 18.05 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.65 | 44.08 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 26.38 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement