Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs MSHPX
FFAFX vs MSHPX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MSHPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.08
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$15.11
Change-$0.43 (-2.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.7M
FFAFX vs MSHPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. MSHPX (5.7M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: MSHPX (2.20) vs FFAFX (0.53). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHPX: FFAFX (5 years) vs MSHPX (6 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: FFAFX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). MSHPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.56 vs. FFAFX (9.20). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. MSHPX (10.55).
| FFAFX | MSHPX | FFAFX / MSHPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.80 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 10.50 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.987 | 22.344 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 5.7M | 5,962,820% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 2.20 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 11.56 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 33.17 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.09 | 10.55 | 408% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement