Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs MSHPX
FFAFX vs MSHPX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MSHPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$15.01
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5M
FFAFX vs MSHPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. MSHPX (5.5M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: MSHPX (2.26) vs FFAFX (0.54). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHPX: FFAFX (5 years) vs MSHPX (6 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: FFAFX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. MSHPX (1.49). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.69 vs. MSHPX (3.77).
| FFAFX | MSHPX | FFAFX / MSHPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.80 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 10.50 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 16.641 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 5.5M | 6,161,396% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 2.26 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 1.49 | 492% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.71 | 25.00 | 255% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.69 | 3.77 | 920% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement