Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs MSHOX
FFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.39
Change+$0.22 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.53M
FFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. MSHOX (5.53M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: MSHOX (1.13) vs FFAFX (0.54). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: FFAFX (5 years) vs MSHOX (6 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: FFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.22 vs. MSHOX (-0.17). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.86 vs. MSHOX (-3.36).
| FFAFX | MSHOX | FFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.95 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 13.89 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.431 | 15.397 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 5.53M | 6,129,091% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.13 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | -0.17 | -4,750% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.39 | 19.57 | 334% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.86 | -3.36 | -1,037% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement