Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs MSHOX
FFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.08
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.27
Change-$0.40 (-2.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.7M
FFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. MSHOX (5.7M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: MSHOX (1.10) vs FFAFX (0.53). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: FFAFX (5 years) vs MSHOX (6 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: FFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). MSHOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.78 vs. FFAFX (9.20). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. MSHOX (2.97).
| FFAFX | MSHOX | FFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.95 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 13.89 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.987 | 21.130 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 5.7M | 5,962,820% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.10 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 9.78 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 27.44 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.09 | 2.97 | 1,450% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement