Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs MSHOX
FFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$82.60
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.70
Change+$0.10 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.57M
FFAFX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. MSHOX (5.57M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: MSHOX (1.11) vs FFAFX (0.58). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: FFAFX (5 years) vs MSHOX (5 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: FFAFX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). MSHOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.18 vs. FFAFX (11.18).
| FFAFX | MSHOX | FFAFX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.95 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 13.89 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.321 | 20.393 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 5.57M | 5,795,801% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.11 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.18 | 16.18 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.65 | 37.80 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 17.69 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement