Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs MLINX
FFAFX vs MLINX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MLINX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$82.60
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Inv Class
Price$10.02
Change+$0.12 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.1B
FFAFX vs MLINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. MLINX (14.1B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than MLINX: FFAFX (0.58) vs MLINX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MLINX: FFAFX (5 years) vs MLINX (17 years). MLINX (1.14) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). MLINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLINX: FFAFX (250) vs MLINX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.18 vs. MLINX (-5.11).
| FFAFX | MLINX | FFAFX / MLINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.13 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.14 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.321 | 10.963 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 14.1B | 2,291% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.18 | -5.11 | -219% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.65 | 29.96 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -2.53 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -3.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement