Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs MIGWX
FFAFX vs MIGWX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MIGWX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$79.38
Change-$9.63 (-10.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Marsico Growth Institutional
Price$25.09
Change-$4.77 (-15.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets382.78M
FFAFX vs MIGWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MIGWX (383M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than MIGWX: FFAFX (0.48) vs MIGWX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MIGWX: FFAFX (5 years) vs MIGWX (4 years). MIGWX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). MIGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. FFAFX (32.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIGWX: FFAFX (250) vs MIGWX (100000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.01 vs. MIGWX (-6.62).
| FFAFX | MIGWX | FFAFX / MIGWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.08 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.08 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.985 | -1.026 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 383M | 87,728% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | -6.62 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.16 | 59.50 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.47 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement