Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LSGRX
FFAFX vs LSGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LSGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$33.67
Change+$0.08 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.15B
FFAFX vs LSGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LSGRX (18.1B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LSGRX: FFAFX (0.54) vs LSGRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LSGRX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LSGRX (35 years). LSGRX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LSGRX (10.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: FFAFX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. LSGRX (6.52). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 40.56 vs. FFAFX (34.69).
| FFAFX | LSGRX | FFAFX / LSGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.66 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.67 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 12.788 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 18.1B | 1,873% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 6.52 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.71 | 63.03 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.69 | 40.56 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 184.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement