Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LGLSX
FFAFX vs LGLSX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LGLSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
Price$54.51
Change+$0.14 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.83B
FFAFX vs LGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LGLSX (7.83B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLSX: FFAFX (0.54) vs LGLSX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLSX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LGLSX (10 years). LGLSX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: LGLSX (0) vs FFAFX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.06 vs. FFAFX (7.34). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.69 vs. LGLSX (27.93).
| FFAFX | LGLSX | FFAFX / LGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.90 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.90 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 16.885 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.83B | 4,330% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 15.06 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.71 | 104.29 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.69 | 27.93 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 140.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement