Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LGLSX
FFAFX vs LGLSX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LGLSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$81.08
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
Price$54.84
Change+$0.08 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.84B
FFAFX vs LGLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LGLSX (7.84B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLSX: FFAFX (0.54) vs LGLSX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLSX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LGLSX (11 years). LGLSX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FFAFX (32.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: LGLSX (0) vs FFAFX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. FFAFX (5.90). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.65 vs. LGLSX (18.47).
| FFAFX | LGLSX | FFAFX / LGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.90 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.90 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.272 | 16.039 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.84B | 4,322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.90 | 11.26 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.66 | 122.47 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.65 | 18.47 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 142.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers