Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LGLRX
FFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LGLRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.71
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R3
Price$53.26
Change-$0.09 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
FFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LGLRX (7.96B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLRX: FFAFX (0.55) vs LGLRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLRX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LGLRX (14 years). LGLRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: LGLRX (0) vs FFAFX (250). LGLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.96 vs. FFAFX (11.90).
| FFAFX | LGLRX | FFAFX / LGLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.15 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.15 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.208 | 17.546 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 7.96B | 4,221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.90 | 28.96 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.42 | 113.55 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 19.47 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 131.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement