Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LGLQX
FFAFX vs LGLQX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LGLQX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.44
Change+$0.08 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R2
Price$51.91
Change+$0.13 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.68B
FFAFX vs LGLQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LGLQX (7.68B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLQX: FFAFX (0.54) vs LGLQX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLQX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LGLQX (14 years). LGLQX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). LGLQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). LGLQX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: LGLQX (0) vs FFAFX (250). LGLQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.66 vs. FFAFX (8.22). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.86 vs. LGLQX (21.94).
| FFAFX | LGLQX | FFAFX / LGLQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.25 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.25 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.431 | 14.845 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.68B | 4,415% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | 11.66 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.39 | 99.27 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.86 | 21.94 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 125.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement