Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LGLFX
FFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LGLFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders F
Price$56.97
Change+$0.15 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.83B
FFAFX vs LGLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LGLFX (7.83B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLFX: FFAFX (0.54) vs LGLFX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLFX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LGLFX (14 years). LGLFX (0.75) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). LGLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). LGLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: LGLFX (0) vs FFAFX (250). LGLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.36 vs. FFAFX (7.34). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.69 vs. LGLFX (30.35).
| FFAFX | LGLFX | FFAFX / LGLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.65 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.75 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 17.164 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.83B | 4,330% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 15.36 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.71 | 105.78 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.69 | 30.35 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 149.48 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers