Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LGLAX
FFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.08
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$54.63
Change-$1.80 (-3.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
FFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. LGLAX (8.01B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: FFAFX (0.53) vs LGLAX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: FFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.77 vs. FFAFX (7.00). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.96 vs. LGLAX (22.16).
| FFAFX | LGLAX | FFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.90 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.90 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.358 | 15.644 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 8.01B | 4,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 15.77 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.28 | 109.55 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.96 | 22.16 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 134.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement