Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LGLAX
FFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$54.49
Change+$0.14 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.83B
FFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. LGLAX (7.83B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: FFAFX (0.54) vs LGLAX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: FFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.19 vs. FFAFX (8.22). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.86 vs. LGLAX (25.03).
| FFAFX | LGLAX | FFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.90 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.90 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.431 | 15.347 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.83B | 4,330% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.22 | 12.19 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.39 | 101.59 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.86 | 25.03 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 137.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement