Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LGLAX
FFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$79.38
Change-$9.63 (-10.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$52.27
Change-$5.54 (-9.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.47B
FFAFX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LGLAX (7.47B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLAX: FFAFX (0.48) vs LGLAX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LGLAX (15 years). LGLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 72.00 vs. FFAFX (32.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: FFAFX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. FFAFX (3.01). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.47 vs. LGLAX (7.77).
| FFAFX | LGLAX | FFAFX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.90 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.90 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.985 | -2.790 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 7.47B | 4,496% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.01 | 6.41 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.16 | 95.55 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.47 | 7.77 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 162.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement