Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LFGCX
FFAFX vs LFGCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LFGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$81.44
Change-$0.87 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Lord Abbett Focused Growth C
Price$39.31
Change-$0.69 (-1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.66M
FFAFX vs LFGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LFGCX (166M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LFGCX: FFAFX (0.48) vs LFGCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LFGCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LFGCX (7 years). LFGCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). LFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. FFAFX (32.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGCX: FFAFX (250) vs LFGCX (1500). LFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.21 vs. FFAFX (11.08). LFGCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.95 vs. FFAFX (23.02).
| FFAFX | LFGCX | FFAFX / LFGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.80 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 2.20 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.669 | 1.549 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 166M | 202,410% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.08 | 16.21 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.06 | 119.42 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.02 | 29.95 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers