Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LFGCX
FFAFX vs LFGCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LFGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.08
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Lord Abbett Focused Growth C
Price$38.95
Change-$1.29 (-3.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets173.12M
FFAFX vs LFGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. LFGCX (173M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LFGCX: FFAFX (0.53) vs LFGCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LFGCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LFGCX (7 years). LFGCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). LFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGCX: FFAFX (250) vs LFGCX (1500). LFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.56 vs. FFAFX (7.00). LFGCX (40.46) and FFAFX (39.96) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFAFX | LFGCX | FFAFX / LFGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.80 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.20 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.358 | 12.637 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 173M | 196,532% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.00 | 14.56 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.28 | 109.18 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.96 | 40.46 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement