Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs KLGCX
FFAFX vs KLGCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs KLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
FFAFX vs KLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. KLGCX (1.07B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than KLGCX: FFAFX (0.54) vs KLGCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than KLGCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs KLGCX (13 years). KLGCX (2.16) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). KLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLGCX: FFAFX (250) vs KLGCX (2500). KLGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.74 vs. FFAFX (7.34). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.69 vs. KLGCX (14.02).
| FFAFX | KLGCX | FFAFX / KLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.08 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.16 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 15.856 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 1.07B | 31,653% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 9.74 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.71 | 75.76 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.69 | 14.02 | 247% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement