Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs KCGSX
FFAFX vs KCGSX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs KCGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$88.83
Change+$0.38 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$25.05
Change+$0.09 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets276.71M
FFAFX vs KCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. KCGSX (277M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: FFAFX (0.54) vs KCGSX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than KCGSX: FFAFX (5 years) vs KCGSX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: KCGSX (0) vs FFAFX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.46 vs. FFAFX (7.34). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 48.20 vs. FFAFX (34.69).
| FFAFX | KCGSX | FFAFX / KCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.86 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.86 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.205 | 20.173 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 277M | 122,744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.34 | 17.46 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.71 | 95.32 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.69 | 48.20 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 148.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers