Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs KCGSX
FFAFX vs KCGSX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs KCGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$81.08
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$23.89
Change+$0.06 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets282.28M
FFAFX vs KCGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. KCGSX (282M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: FFAFX (0.54) vs KCGSX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than KCGSX: FFAFX (5 years) vs KCGSX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFAFX (32.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: KCGSX (0) vs FFAFX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.48 vs. FFAFX (5.90). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 44.76 vs. FFAFX (24.65).
| FFAFX | KCGSX | FFAFX / KCGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.86 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.86 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.272 | 15.022 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 282M | 120,213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.90 | 11.48 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.66 | 101.43 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.65 | 44.76 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 141.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement