Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs HSUCX
FFAFX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$84.20
Change+$0.28 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$33.48
Change+$0.09 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.31M
FFAFX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. HSUCX (75.3M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: FFAFX (0.58) vs HSUCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: FFAFX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). HSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.61 vs. FFAFX (18.10).
| FFAFX | HSUCX | FFAFX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.15 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.15 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.477 | 3.653 | 369% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 75.3M | 435,591% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.10 | 19.61 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.41 | 57.70 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 4.46 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -82.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement