Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs HSUCX
FFAFX vs HSUCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs HSUCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.95
Change+$0.11 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Rational Dynamic Brands C
Price$33.15
Change+$0.22 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.89M
FFAFX vs HSUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. HSUCX (65.9M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than HSUCX: FFAFX (0.54) vs HSUCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than HSUCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs HSUCX (12 years). HSUCX (2.15) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). HSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 340.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HSUCX: FFAFX (250) vs HSUCX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.13 vs. HSUCX (-2.59). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.35 vs. HSUCX (-13.11).
| FFAFX | HSUCX | FFAFX / HSUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.15 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 2.15 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.226 | 2.632 | 807% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 65.9M | 514,416% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | -2.59 | -276% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.89 | 56.74 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.35 | -13.11 | -277% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -8.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement