Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs GLCUX
FFAFX vs GLCUX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs GLCUX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.08
Change-$1.95 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R6
Price$38.75
Change-$0.87 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
FFAFX vs GLCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. GLCUX (1.65B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than GLCUX: FFAFX (0.53) vs GLCUX (0.05). FFAFX was incepted earlier than GLCUX: FFAFX (5 years) vs GLCUX (10 years). GLCUX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). GLCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCUX: FFAFX (250) vs GLCUX (5000000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.20 vs. GLCUX (5.75). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. GLCUX (-4.17).
| FFAFX | GLCUX | FFAFX / GLCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.55 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.58 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.987 | 16.667 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 1.65B | 20,619% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.05 | 1,032% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 5.75 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.02 | 46.34 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.09 | -4.17 | -1,033% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.30 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement