Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs GLCUX
FFAFX vs GLCUX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs GLCUX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$81.08
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R6
Price$37.10
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
FFAFX vs GLCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. GLCUX (1.66B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than GLCUX: FFAFX (0.54) vs GLCUX (0.05). FFAFX was incepted earlier than GLCUX: FFAFX (5 years) vs GLCUX (10 years). GLCUX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). GLCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. FFAFX (32.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCUX: FFAFX (250) vs GLCUX (5000000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.90 vs. GLCUX (5.28). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.65 vs. GLCUX (-6.59).
| FFAFX | GLCUX | FFAFX / GLCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.55 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.58 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.272 | 9.246 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 1.66B | 20,409% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.05 | 1,024% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.90 | 5.28 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.66 | 71.57 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.65 | -6.59 | -374% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement