UNH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FFA | UNH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 76% | 7 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 72% | 16 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 55% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FFA and DHR have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFA and DHR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFA | 100% | +0.03% | ||
| DHR - FFA | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| JPM - FFA | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
| AAPL - FFA | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| MSFT - FFA | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| UNH - FFA | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNH has been loosely correlated with ELV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNH jumps, then ELV could also see price increases.