Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEUPX vs MNOZX
FEUPX vs MNOZX Comparison
Open Charts FEUPX vs MNOZX
American Funds EUPAC F3
Price$64.12
Change+$0.20 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.04B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$36.39
Change+$0.13 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets358.42M
FEUPX vs MNOZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEUPX vs. MNOZX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEUPX is a Hold and MNOZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FEUPX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. MNOZX (358M). MNOZX pays higher dividends than FEUPX: MNOZX (1.21) vs FEUPX (0.92). FEUPX was incepted earlier than MNOZX: FEUPX (9 years) vs MNOZX (7 years). MNOZX (0.71) is less costly to investors than FEUPX (0.47). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FEUPX (35.00). FEUPX (1000000) and MNOZX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FEUPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.08 vs. MNOZX (3.66). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 40.23 vs. FEUPX (18.18).
| FEUPX | MNOZX | FEUPX / MNOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.66 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.71 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.226 | 13.223 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 358M | 37,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.21 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.08 | 3.66 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.27 | 59.41 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.18 | 40.23 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |