FET
Price
$46.10
Change
-$0.98 (-2.08%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:41 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
535.67M
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HAL
Price
$34.22
Change
+$0.35 (+1.03%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
28.51B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FET vs HAL

Header iconFET vs HAL Comparison
Open Charts FET vs HALBanner chart's image
Forum Energy Technologies
Price$46.10
Change-$0.98 (-2.08%)
Volume$211
Capitalization535.67M
Halliburton
Price$34.22
Change+$0.35 (+1.03%)
Volume$4.48K
Capitalization28.51B
FET vs HAL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FET vs. HAL commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FET is a StrongBuy and HAL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FET: $47.08 vs. HAL: $33.87)
Brand notoriety: FET: Not notable vs. HAL: Notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FET: 193% vs. HAL: 84%
Market capitalization -- FET: $535.67M vs. HAL: $28.51B
FET [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $535.67M. HAL’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $28.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $74.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $4.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FET’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAL is a better buy in the long-term than FET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FET’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FET’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HAL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FET is a better buy in the short-term than HAL.

Price Growth

FET (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +4.14% price change this week, while HAL (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -1.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

FET is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

HAL is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+1.42% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAL($28.5B) has a higher market cap than FET($536M). FET YTD gains are higher at: 27.415 vs. HAL (19.851). HAL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.49B vs. FET (-40.36M). HAL has more cash in the bank: 2.03B vs. FET (31.7M). FET has less debt than HAL: FET (225M) vs HAL (8.57B). HAL has higher revenues than FET: HAL (22.1B) vs FET (790M).
FETHALFET / HAL
Capitalization536M28.5B2%
EBITDA-40.36M3.49B-1%
Gain YTD27.41519.851138%
P/E RatioN/A22.58-
Revenue790M22.1B4%
Total Cash31.7M2.03B2%
Total Debt225M8.57B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FET vs HAL: Fundamental Ratings
FET
HAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2517
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3061
SMR RATING
1..100
9660
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
366
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
996
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FET's Valuation (65) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as HAL (90). This means that FET’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.

FET's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as HAL (61). This means that FET’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's SMR Rating (60) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FET (96). This means that HAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FET’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as FET (36). This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to FET’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for FET (99). This means that HAL’s stock grew significantly faster than FET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FETHAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYVIX287.656.63
+2.36%
Rydex Energy Services Inv
BIPSX37.120.13
+0.35%
ProFunds Biotechnology UltraSector Svc
GCSCX20.840.04
+0.19%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts C
IUEFX31.710.03
+0.09%
JPMorgan International Focus R5
CGFYX80.66-1.53
-1.86%
Columbia Cornerstone Growth Inst 3

FET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FET has been closely correlated with PUMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FET jumps, then PUMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FET
1D Price
Change %
FET100%
+3.04%
PUMP - FET
66%
Closely correlated
N/A
VAL - FET
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
OII - FET
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.85%
OIS - FET
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.72%
HAL - FET
65%
Loosely correlated
+3.17%
More

HAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAL has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAL jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAL
1D Price
Change %
HAL100%
+3.17%
SLB - HAL
86%
Closely correlated
+3.56%
WFRD - HAL
79%
Closely correlated
+3.90%
NOV - HAL
78%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
RES - HAL
74%
Closely correlated
-17.37%
WHD - HAL
72%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
More