FESNF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.03 (-13.04%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
463.9M
FREVS
Price
$13.70
Change
-$0.15 (-1.08%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
102.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FESNF vs FREVS

Header iconFESNF vs FREVS Comparison
Open Charts FESNF vs FREVSBanner chart's image
First Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$0.20
Change-$0.03 (-13.04%)
Volume$935
Capitalization463.9M
First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey
Price$13.70
Change-$0.15 (-1.08%)
Volume$10.7K
Capitalization102.36M
FESNF vs FREVS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FESNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FREVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FESNF vs. FREVS commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FESNF is a Buy and FREVS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FESNF: $0.20 vs. FREVS: $13.70)
Brand notoriety: FESNF and FREVS are both not notable
FESNF represents the Managed Health Care, while FREVS is part of the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FESNF: 15% vs. FREVS: 505%
Market capitalization -- FESNF: $463.9M vs. FREVS: $102.36M
FESNF [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $463.9M. FREVS’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $102.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $116.98B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $27.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $8.92B. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FESNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFREVS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FESNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FREVS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FREVS is a better buy in the long-term than FESNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FESNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FREVS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FESNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FREVS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FESNF is a better buy in the short-term than FREVS.

Price Growth

FESNF (@Managed Health Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FREVS (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -13.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.29%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (-0.35% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

@Media Conglomerates (-1.53% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FESNF($464M) has a higher market cap than FREVS($102M). FREVS has higher P/E ratio than FESNF: FREVS (29.78) vs FESNF (13.96). FESNF YTD gains are higher at: 3.773 vs. FREVS (-18.809). FREVS has less debt than FESNF: FREVS (127M) vs FESNF (462M).
FESNFFREVSFESNF / FREVS
Capitalization464M102M455%
EBITDA71.3MN/A-
Gain YTD3.773-18.809-20%
P/E Ratio13.9629.7847%
Revenue101MN/A-
Total Cash35.6MN/A-
Total Debt462M127M364%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FESNF vs FREVS: Fundamental Ratings
FESNF
FREVS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10049
SMR RATING
1..100
8717
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5681
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5036

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FESNF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as FREVS (22). This means that FESNF’s stock grew similarly to FREVS’s over the last 12 months.

FREVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FESNF (100). This means that FREVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

FREVS's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FESNF (87). This means that FREVS’s stock grew significantly faster than FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

FESNF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as FREVS (81). This means that FESNF’s stock grew similarly to FREVS’s over the last 12 months.

FREVS's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FESNF (8). This means that FREVS’s stock grew similarly to FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FESNFFREVS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FESNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FREVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PETZX14.400.24
+1.69%
Gabelli Pet Parents'™
GHAAX46.460.62
+1.35%
VanEck Global Resources Fund A
OPOCX106.170.90
+0.85%
Invesco Discovery A
MIIOX32.300.14
+0.44%
Marsico International Opportunities Inst
PGTYX88.03-0.12
-0.14%
Putnam Global Technology Y

FESNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FESNF and ATRRF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FESNF and ATRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FESNF
1D Price
Change %
FESNF100%
N/A
ATRRF - FESNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEIYF - FESNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FREVS - FESNF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
FBBPF - FESNF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
FRMUF - FESNF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
More

FREVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FREVS and FRMUF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FREVS and FRMUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FREVS
1D Price
Change %
FREVS100%
-1.08%
FRMUF - FREVS
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
FESNF - FREVS
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBBPF - FREVS
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
FRIVF - FREVS
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DREUF - FREVS
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
More