FESNF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.03 (-13.04%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
457.69M
FREVS
Price
$13.55
Change
+$0.24 (+1.80%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
101.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FESNF vs FREVS

Header iconFESNF vs FREVS Comparison
Open Charts FESNF vs FREVSBanner chart's image
First Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$0.20
Change-$0.03 (-13.04%)
Volume$935
Capitalization457.69M
First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey
Price$13.55
Change+$0.24 (+1.80%)
Volume$1.69K
Capitalization101.24M
FESNF vs FREVS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FESNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FREVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FESNF vs. FREVS commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FESNF is a Hold and FREVS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FESNF: $0.20 vs. FREVS: $13.55)
Brand notoriety: FESNF and FREVS are both not notable
FESNF represents the Managed Health Care, while FREVS is part of the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FESNF: 13% vs. FREVS: 92%
Market capitalization -- FESNF: $457.69M vs. FREVS: $101.24M
FESNF [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $457.69M. FREVS’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $101.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $116.34B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $27.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $8.71B. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FESNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFREVS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FESNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FREVS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FREVS is a better buy in the long-term than FESNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FESNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FREVS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FESNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FREVS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FESNF and FREVS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FESNF (@Managed Health Care) experienced а -7.26% price change this week, while FREVS (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -4.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.20%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (+1.17% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

@Media Conglomerates (-0.40% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FESNF($458M) has a higher market cap than FREVS($101M). FESNF has higher P/E ratio than FREVS: FESNF (13.96) vs FREVS (5.82). FESNF YTD gains are higher at: 3.773 vs. FREVS (-19.697). FREVS has less debt than FESNF: FREVS (127M) vs FESNF (462M).
FESNFFREVSFESNF / FREVS
Capitalization458M101M453%
EBITDA71.3MN/A-
Gain YTD3.773-19.697-19%
P/E Ratio13.965.82240%
Revenue101MN/A-
Total Cash35.6MN/A-
Total Debt462M127M364%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FESNF vs FREVS: Fundamental Ratings
FESNF
FREVS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10043
SMR RATING
1..100
8717
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5683
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FESNF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as FREVS (20). This means that FESNF’s stock grew similarly to FREVS’s over the last 12 months.

FREVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FESNF (100). This means that FREVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

FREVS's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FESNF (87). This means that FREVS’s stock grew significantly faster than FESNF’s over the last 12 months.

FESNF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as FREVS (83). This means that FESNF’s stock grew similarly to FREVS’s over the last 12 months.

FESNF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FREVS (100). This means that FESNF’s stock grew significantly faster than FREVS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FESNFFREVS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FESNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FREVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKKLY25.170.32
+1.29%
Bangkok Bank Public Co Ltd.
BALPX9.850.01
+0.10%
BlackRock Event Driven Equity Inv A
RAFI3.80N/A
N/A
Regency Affiliates, Inc.
NTCYF42.85N/A
N/A
Netcompany Group AS
MGTE1.98-0.01
-0.50%
Marblegate Capital Corporation

FESNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FESNF and ATRRF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FESNF and ATRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FESNF
1D Price
Change %
FESNF100%
N/A
ATRRF - FESNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEIYF - FESNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FREVS - FESNF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBBPF - FESNF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
FRMUF - FESNF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
More

FREVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FREVS and FRMUF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FREVS and FRMUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FREVS
1D Price
Change %
FREVS100%
N/A
FRMUF - FREVS
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
FESNF - FREVS
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBBPF - FREVS
-1%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
FRIVF - FREVS
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DREUF - FREVS
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More