FENG
Price
$2.32
Change
+$0.03 (+1.31%)
Updated
Oct 20 closing price
Capitalization
27.87M
28 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SFUNY
Price
$6.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
54.21M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FENG vs SFUNY

Header iconFENG vs SFUNY Comparison
Open Charts FENG vs SFUNYBanner chart's image
Phoenix New Media
Price$2.32
Change+$0.03 (+1.31%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization27.87M
Fang Holdings
Price$6.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$371
Capitalization54.21M
FENG vs SFUNY Comparison Chart in %
FENG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFUNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FENG vs. SFUNY commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FENG is a Hold and SFUNY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (FENG: $2.32 vs. SFUNY: $6.00)
Brand notoriety: FENG and SFUNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FENG: 8% vs. SFUNY: 8%
Market capitalization -- FENG: $27.87M vs. SFUNY: $54.21M
FENG [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $27.87M. SFUNY’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $54.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $3.11T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $82.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FENG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSFUNY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FENG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SFUNY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FENG and SFUNY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FENG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFUNY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FENG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFUNY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFUNY is a better buy in the short-term than FENG.

Price Growth

FENG (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SFUNY (@Internet Software/Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

FENG is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (+0.03% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFUNY($54.2M) has a higher market cap than FENG($27.9M). FENG YTD gains are higher at: -2.110 vs. SFUNY (-14.286). SFUNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -40.83M vs. FENG (-64.82M). FENG has less debt than SFUNY: FENG (49.2M) vs SFUNY (725M). FENG has higher revenues than SFUNY: FENG (725M) vs SFUNY (220M).
FENGSFUNYFENG / SFUNY
Capitalization27.9M54.2M51%
EBITDA-64.82M-40.83M159%
Gain YTD-2.110-14.28615%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue725M220M330%
Total Cash976MN/A-
Total Debt49.2M725M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FENG vs SFUNY: Fundamental Ratings
FENG
SFUNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9735
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a12

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FENG's Valuation (35) in the Broadcasting industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFUNY (90) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FENG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFUNY’s over the last 12 months.

FENG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as SFUNY (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FENG’s stock grew similarly to SFUNY’s over the last 12 months.

FENG's SMR Rating (94) in the Broadcasting industry is in the same range as SFUNY (99) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that FENG’s stock grew similarly to SFUNY’s over the last 12 months.

SFUNY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as FENG (59) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that SFUNY’s stock grew similarly to FENG’s over the last 12 months.

SFUNY's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FENG (97) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that SFUNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FENG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FENGSFUNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FENG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFUNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLPHY8.630.16
+1.89%
CLP Holdings Ltd.
AABVF0.02N/A
N/A
Aberdeen International Inc.
FNNTF32.50N/A
N/A
FLATEXDEGIRO AG
SVBT51.01N/A
N/A
SVB&T Corporation
ITMPF1.04-0.06
-5.02%
ITM Power Plc

FENG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FENG and LCFY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FENG and LCFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FENG
1D Price
Change %
FENG100%
+1.31%
LCFY - FENG
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.31%
JFIN - FENG
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
BZ - FENG
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.47%
ATDRY - FENG
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BIDU - FENG
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
More

SFUNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFUNY and GRPN have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFUNY and GRPN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFUNY
1D Price
Change %
SFUNY100%
N/A
GRPN - SFUNY
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
FENG - SFUNY
0%
Poorly correlated
-4.58%
NBIS - SFUNY
0%
Poorly correlated
-7.80%
PERI - SFUNY
-2%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
GOOG - SFUNY
-5%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
More