FENC
Price
$4.06
Change
-$0.34 (-7.73%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:14 PM (EDT)
137 days until earnings call
IPHYF
Price
$1.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

FENC vs IPHYF

Header iconFENC vs IPHYF Comparison
Open Charts FENC vs IPHYFBanner chart's image
Fennec Pharmaceuticals
Price$4.06
Change-$0.34 (-7.73%)
Volume$700
CapitalizationN/A
Innate Pharma
Price$1.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
FENC vs IPHYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FENC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FENC vs. IPHYF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FENC is a Hold and IPHYF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (FENC: $4.40 vs. IPHYF: $1.28)
Brand notoriety: FENC and IPHYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FENC: 204% vs. IPHYF: 4%
Market capitalization -- FENC: $119.58M vs. IPHYF: $138.19M
FENC [@Biotechnology] is valued at $119.58M. IPHYF’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $138.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $475.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FENC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIPHYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FENC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IPHYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IPHYF is a better buy in the long-term than FENC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FENC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FENC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

FENC (@Biotechnology) experienced а +0.92% price change this week, while IPHYF (@Biotechnology) price change was -42.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -5.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

FENC is expected to report earnings on Apr 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-5.98% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IPHYF($138M) has a higher market cap than FENC($120M). IPHYF YTD gains are higher at: -54.930 vs. FENC (-60.784).
FENCIPHYFFENC / IPHYF
Capitalization120M138M87%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-60.784-54.930111%
P/E Ratio60.43N/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash1.31MN/A-
Total Debt31.4MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FENC vs IPHYF: Fundamental Ratings
FENC
IPHYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6399
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8395
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IPHYF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FENC (90) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that IPHYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FENC’s over the last 12 months.

IPHYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FENC (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that IPHYF’s stock grew similarly to FENC’s over the last 12 months.

IPHYF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as FENC (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that IPHYF’s stock grew similarly to FENC’s over the last 12 months.

FENC's Price Growth Rating (83) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as IPHYF (95) in the null industry. This means that FENC’s stock grew similarly to IPHYF’s over the last 12 months.

FENC's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as IPHYF (100) in the null industry. This means that FENC’s stock grew similarly to IPHYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FENC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FENC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

FENC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FENC has been loosely correlated with ONPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FENC jumps, then ONPPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FENC
1D Price
Change %
FENC100%
-1.79%
ONPPF - FENC
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCPX - FENC
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
ATXS - FENC
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.90%
IPHYF - FENC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BEAM - FENC
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.33%
More

IPHYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPHYF has been loosely correlated with MBIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IPHYF jumps, then MBIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPHYF
1D Price
Change %
IPHYF100%
N/A
MBIO - IPHYF
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.00%
ONPPF - IPHYF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HLVX - IPHYF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.53%
SLRX - IPHYF
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
RVMD - IPHYF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
More