Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMKX vs RNWFX
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FEMKX vs RNWFX
Fidelity Emerging Markets
Price$53.55
Change+$4.54 (+9.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.82B
American Funds New World R5
Price$99.24
Change+$2.53 (+2.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMKX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. FEMKX (9.82B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FEMKX: RNWFX (1.31) vs FEMKX (0.05). FEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FEMKX (35 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FEMKX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). RNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FEMKX (31.00). FEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FEMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FEMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.90 vs. RNWFX (27.90). RNWFX (12.39) and FEMKX (12.22) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FEMKX | RNWFX | FEMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.62 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.998 | 6.094 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.82B | 75.5B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 1.31 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.90 | 27.90 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.95 | 43.85 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.22 | 12.39 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 175.93 | 127.30 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement