Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMKX vs RNWFX
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FEMKX vs RNWFX
Fidelity Emerging Markets
Price$49.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.98B
American Funds New World R5
Price$93.72
Change+$0.22 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
FEMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMKX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. FEMKX (8.98B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FEMKX: RNWFX (0.95) vs FEMKX (0.51). FEMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FEMKX (35 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FEMKX (0.87) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FEMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RNWFX (37.00). FEMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FEMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FEMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.13 vs. RNWFX (19.11). FEMKX return over 5 years is better than : 15.59 vs. RNWFX (12.02).
| FEMKX | RNWFX | FEMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.62 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.806 | 21.020 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.98B | 75.3B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.95 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.13 | 19.11 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.42 | 44.61 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.59 | 12.02 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.07 | 92.74 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers