FEERF
Price
$0.03
Change
+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.57M
MCHHF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
208.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FEERF vs MCHHF

Header iconFEERF vs MCHHF Comparison
Open Charts FEERF vs MCHHFBanner chart's image
Freeport Resources
Price$0.03
Change+$0.01 (+50.00%)
Volume$11.76K
Capitalization7.57M
MacMahon Holdings
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
Capitalization208.11M
FEERF vs MCHHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FEERF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FEERF vs. MCHHF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEERF is a Hold and MCHHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FEERF: $0.03 vs. MCHHF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: FEERF and MCHHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FEERF: 47% vs. MCHHF: 31%
Market capitalization -- FEERF: $7.57M vs. MCHHF: $208.11M
FEERF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.57M. MCHHF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $208.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FEERF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FEERF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCHHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCHHF is a better buy in the long-term than FEERF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FEERF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FEERF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MCHHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FEERF is a better buy in the short-term than MCHHF.

Price Growth

FEERF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +19.77% price change this week, while MCHHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHHF($208M) has a higher market cap than FEERF($7.57M). FEERF YTD gains are higher at: 43.603 vs. MCHHF (-12.546). MCHHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 284M vs. FEERF (-2.19M). MCHHF has more cash in the bank: 198M vs. FEERF (1.45M). MCHHF has higher revenues than FEERF: MCHHF (1.88B) vs FEERF (0).
FEERFMCHHFFEERF / MCHHF
Capitalization7.57M208M4%
EBITDA-2.19M284M-1%
Gain YTD43.603-12.546-348%
P/E RatioN/A6.39-
Revenue01.88B-
Total Cash1.45M198M1%
Total DebtN/A413M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FEERF vs MCHHF: Fundamental Ratings
FEERF
MCHHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10076
SMR RATING
1..100
9984
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCHHF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FEERF (52). This means that MCHHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FEERF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as FEERF (100). This means that MCHHF’s stock grew similarly to FEERF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHHF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as FEERF (99). This means that MCHHF’s stock grew similarly to FEERF’s over the last 12 months.

FEERF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as MCHHF (58). This means that FEERF’s stock grew similarly to MCHHF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHHF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FEERF (100). This means that MCHHF’s stock grew significantly faster than FEERF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FEERFMCHHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FEERF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MANZF0.29N/A
N/A
Manz Automation Ag
MONOF14.17N/A
N/A
Monotaro Co., Ltd.
TNCAF12.94N/A
N/A
TC Energy Corp.
ILKAF3.55-0.02
-0.56%
Iluka Resources Ltd.
IDKFF0.05N/A
-3.02%
ThreeD Capital Inc.

FEERF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FEERF and CPPKF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FEERF and CPPKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FEERF
1D Price
Change %
FEERF100%
+19.77%
CPPKF - FEERF
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.14%
MCHHF - FEERF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KMRPF - FEERF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
CONXF - FEERF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EMOTF - FEERF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
More

MCHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHHF and AOTVF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHHF and AOTVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHHF
1D Price
Change %
MCHHF100%
N/A
AOTVF - MCHHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.66%
TSKFF - MCHHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
IONR - MCHHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.97%
NICMF - MCHHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FEERF - MCHHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+19.77%
More