FEED
Price
$3.23
Change
-$0.61 (-15.89%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
3.51M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SENS
Price
$7.33
Change
+$0.37 (+5.32%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
299.49M
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FEED vs SENS

Header iconFEED vs SENS Comparison
Open Charts FEED vs SENSBanner chart's image
ENvue Medical
Price$3.23
Change-$0.61 (-15.89%)
Volume$66.96M
Capitalization3.51M
Senseonics Holdings
Price$7.33
Change+$0.37 (+5.32%)
Volume$893.57K
Capitalization299.49M
FEED vs SENS Comparison Chart in %
FEED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SENS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FEED vs. SENS commentary
Feb 01, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEED is a Buy and SENS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 01, 2026
Stock price -- (FEED: $3.23 vs. SENS: $7.33)
Brand notoriety: FEED and SENS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FEED: 549% vs. SENS: 210%
Market capitalization -- FEED: $3.51M vs. SENS: $299.49M
FEED [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $3.51M. SENS’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $299.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $190.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FEED’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSENS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FEED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SENS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FEED is a better buy in the long-term than SENS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FEED’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SENS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FEED’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SENS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SENS is a better buy in the short-term than FEED.

Price Growth

FEED (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +193.64% price change this week, while SENS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

SENS is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-1.97% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SENS($299M) has a higher market cap than FEED($3.51M). FEED YTD gains are higher at: 39.827 vs. SENS (32.790).
FEEDSENSFEED / SENS
Capitalization3.51M299M1%
EBITDAN/A-55.95M-
Gain YTD39.82732.790121%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A29.3M-
Total CashN/A111M-
Total DebtN/A41.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FEED vs SENS: Fundamental Ratings
FEED
SENS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9022
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82100
SMR RATING
1..100
96100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10028
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FEED's Valuation (25) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SENS (54) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that FEED’s stock grew similarly to SENS’s over the last 12 months.

FEED's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SENS (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that FEED’s stock grew similarly to SENS’s over the last 12 months.

FEED's SMR Rating (96) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SENS (100) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that FEED’s stock grew similarly to SENS’s over the last 12 months.

FEED's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SENS (60) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that FEED’s stock grew similarly to SENS’s over the last 12 months.

SENS's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for FEED (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that SENS’s stock grew significantly faster than FEED’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FEEDSENS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FEED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SENS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALLE165.390.93
+0.57%
Allegion Public Limited
MGRT5.90-0.01
-0.17%
Mega Fortune Co Ltd
SDRL38.48-0.19
-0.49%
Seadrill Limited
ATEX26.26-0.33
-1.26%
Anterix
VTAK1.94-0.14
-6.73%
Catheter Precision Inc

FEED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FEED has been loosely correlated with CLPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FEED jumps, then CLPT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FEED
1D Price
Change %
FEED100%
-15.89%
CLPT - FEED
33%
Loosely correlated
-3.65%
CDNA - FEED
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
SENS - FEED
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.32%
RSMDF - FEED
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXAS - FEED
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
More

SENS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SENS has been closely correlated with AEMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SENS jumps, then AEMD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SENS
1D Price
Change %
SENS100%
+5.32%
AEMD - SENS
77%
Closely correlated
-1.96%
QSI - SENS
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.42%
GEHC - SENS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
BFLY - SENS
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.58%
NNOX - SENS
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.19%
More