Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEATX vs TRZNX
FEATX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts FEATX vs TRZNX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia M
Price$54.40
Change-$0.13 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets489.18M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$18.95
Change-$0.06 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.96B
FEATX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 1.96B vs. FEATX (489M). TRZNX pays higher dividends than FEATX: TRZNX (2.08) vs FEATX (0.00). FEATX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: FEATX (26 years) vs TRZNX (4 years). FEATX (1.47) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). FEATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. TRZNX (54.80). FEATX (0) and TRZNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FEATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.24 vs. TRZNX (16.17).
| FEATX | TRZNX | FEATX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.83 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.457 | 14.571 | 154% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 489M | 1.96B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.24 | 16.17 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.29 | 19.63 | 297% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.13 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement