Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEAAX vs TRZNX
FEAAX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts FEAAX vs TRZNX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia A
Price$57.22
Change-$0.14 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets489.18M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$18.95
Change-$0.06 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.96B
FEAAX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 1.96B vs. FEAAX (489M). TRZNX pays higher dividends than FEAAX: TRZNX (2.08) vs FEAAX (0.00). FEAAX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: FEAAX (31 years) vs TRZNX (4 years). FEAAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). FEAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. TRZNX (54.80). FEAAX (0) and TRZNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FEAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.57 vs. TRZNX (16.17).
| FEAAX | TRZNX | FEAAX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.83 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.643 | 14.571 | 155% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 489M | 1.96B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.57 | 16.17 | 220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.51 | 19.63 | 303% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.16 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement