Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEAAX vs PNSIX
FEAAX vs PNSIX Comparison
Open Charts FEAAX vs PNSIX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia A
Price$63.76
Change+$0.50 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets554.38M
T. Rowe Price New Asia I
Price$20.96
Change+$0.21 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.15B
FEAAX vs PNSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEAAX vs. PNSIX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEAAX is a Buy and PNSIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSIX has more cash in the bank: 2.15B vs. FEAAX (554M). PNSIX pays higher dividends than FEAAX: PNSIX (1.03) vs FEAAX (0.00). FEAAX was incepted earlier than PNSIX: FEAAX (32 years) vs PNSIX (10 years). FEAAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than PNSIX (0.86). FEAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. PNSIX (54.80). FEAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNSIX: FEAAX (0) vs PNSIX (500000). FEAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.90 vs. PNSIX (22.42). FEAAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.72 vs. PNSIX (-11.15).
| FEAAX | PNSIX | FEAAX / PNSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.83 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.86 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.258 | 24.475 | 144% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 554M | 2.15B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.03 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.90 | 22.42 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.22 | 36.27 | 243% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.72 | -11.15 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.71 | 47.21 | 273% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement