Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEAAX vs MIPTX
FEAAX vs MIPTX Comparison
Open Charts FEAAX vs MIPTX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia A
Price$52.96
Change+$0.61 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets453.97M
Matthews Pacific Tiger Instl
Price$19.17
Change+$0.18 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets693.65M
FEAAX vs MIPTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEAAX vs. MIPTX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEAAX is a Hold and MIPTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIPTX has more cash in the bank: 694M vs. FEAAX (454M). MIPTX pays higher dividends than FEAAX: MIPTX (3.16) vs FEAAX (0.00). FEAAX was incepted earlier than MIPTX: FEAAX (31 years) vs MIPTX (15 years). FEAAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than MIPTX (1.09). MIPTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 386.73 vs. FEAAX (59.00). FEAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPTX: FEAAX (0) vs MIPTX (100000). FEAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.20 vs. MIPTX (1.00). FEAAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.23 vs. MIPTX (-22.60).
| FEAAX | MIPTX | FEAAX / MIPTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.09 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.09 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.931 | 8.489 | 141% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 454M | 694M | 65% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 3.16 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.20 | 1.00 | 2,211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.60 | -8.44 | -552% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.23 | -22.60 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.93 | -25.16 | -250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers