Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYZX vs RGAHX
FDYZX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FDYZX vs RGAHX
Franklin DynaTech Adv
Price$199.89
Change+$2.82 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.49B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.72
Change+$0.80 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
FDYZX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYZX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYZX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. FDYZX (27.5B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than FDYZX: RGAHX (0.47) vs FDYZX (0.00). FDYZX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FDYZX (17 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). FDYZX (0.54) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FDYZX (11.94). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYZX: RGAHX (250) vs FDYZX (100000). FDYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.09 vs. RGAHX (10.98). FDYZX return over 5 years is better than : 74.61 vs. RGAHX (50.13).
| FDYZX | RGAHX | FDYZX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.44 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.44 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.289 | 11.275 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.5B | 323B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.09 | 10.98 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.60 | 60.14 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.61 | 50.13 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 296.37 | N/A | - |