Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYZX vs RGACX
FDYZX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FDYZX vs RGACX
Franklin DynaTech Adv
Price$209.06
Change-$0.26 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.44B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FDYZX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYZX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYZX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FDYZX (28.4B). RGACX pays higher dividends than FDYZX: RGACX (0.07) vs FDYZX (0.00). FDYZX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FDYZX (17 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FDYZX (0.54). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FDYZX (11.94). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYZX: RGACX (250) vs FDYZX (100000). FDYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.71 vs. RGACX (14.08). FDYZX return over 5 years is better than : 73.46 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| FDYZX | RGACX | FDYZX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.94 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.94 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.303 | 14.044 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 329B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.71 | 14.08 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.19 | 41.19 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.46 | 41.95 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 304.61 | 83.68 | 364% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement