Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYZX vs GFAFX
FDYZX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDYZX vs GFAFX
Franklin DynaTech Adv
Price$213.94
Change-$6.88 (-3.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.43B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.34
Change-$1.93 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
FDYZX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYZX vs. GFAFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYZX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. FDYZX (29.4B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FDYZX: GFAFX (0.28) vs FDYZX (0.00). FDYZX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FDYZX (18 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FDYZX (0.54). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FDYZX (11.94). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYZX: GFAFX (250) vs FDYZX (100000). FDYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.06 vs. GFAFX (6.64). FDYZX return over 5 years is better than : 61.78 vs. GFAFX (37.02).
| FDYZX | GFAFX | FDYZX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.67 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.971 | 17.055 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.4B | 340B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.28 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | 6.64 | 227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.24 | 63.22 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.78 | 37.02 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 323.98 | 95.21 | 340% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers