Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYZX vs GFAFX
FDYZX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDYZX vs GFAFX
Franklin DynaTech Adv
Price$216.58
Change+$0.36 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.06B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
FDYZX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYZX vs. GFAFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYZX is a StrongBuy and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. FDYZX (29.1B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FDYZX: GFAFX (0.29) vs FDYZX (0.00). FDYZX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FDYZX (17 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FDYZX (0.54). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FDYZX (11.94). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYZX: GFAFX (250) vs FDYZX (100000). FDYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.33 vs. GFAFX (11.53). FDYZX return over 5 years is better than : 62.56 vs. GFAFX (40.02).
| FDYZX | GFAFX | FDYZX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.67 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.414 | 17.923 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.1B | 337B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.33 | 11.53 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 123.09 | 72.21 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.56 | 40.02 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 340.38 | 100.61 | 338% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers