Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYNX vs RGEBX
FDYNX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FDYNX vs RGEBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$74.89
Change-$0.91 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
FDYNX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYNX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYNX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. FDYNX (26.1B). FDYNX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDYNX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FDYNX (29 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). FDYNX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FDYNX (11.94). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYNX: RGEBX (250) vs FDYNX (1000). FDYNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.92 vs. RGEBX (7.68). FDYNX return over 5 years is better than : 71.31 vs. RGEBX (45.42).
| FDYNX | RGEBX | FDYNX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.09 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.09 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.812 | 4.829 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.1B | 306B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.92 | 7.68 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.85 | 51.01 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.31 | 45.42 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.09 | 65.87 | 345% |