Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYNX vs RGEBX
FDYNX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FDYNX vs RGEBX
Franklin DynaTech C
Price$137.53
Change-$29.25 (-17.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.87B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
FDYNX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYNX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYNX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FDYNX (27.9B). FDYNX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDYNX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FDYNX (29 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). FDYNX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDYNX (29.61). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYNX: RGEBX (250) vs FDYNX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. FDYNX (-2.62). FDYNX return over 5 years is better than : 12.37 vs. RGEBX (9.88).
| FDYNX | RGEBX | FDYNX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.08 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.08 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.202 | -1.057 | 303% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.9B | 336B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.62 | 1.80 | -146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.68 | 41.63 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.37 | 9.88 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.48 | 110.02 | 259% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers