Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYNX vs GFFFX
FDYNX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts FDYNX vs GFFFX
Franklin DynaTech C
Price$137.53
Change-$29.25 (-17.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.87B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$79.31
Change-$9.63 (-10.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
FDYNX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYNX vs. GFFFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYNX is a StrongBuy and GFFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. FDYNX (27.9B). GFFFX pays higher dividends than FDYNX: GFFFX (0.46) vs FDYNX (0.00). FDYNX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: FDYNX (29 years) vs GFFFX (18 years). FDYNX (1.54) is less costly to investors than GFFFX (0.40). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FDYNX (29.61). GFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYNX: GFFFX (250) vs FDYNX (1000). GFFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.94 vs. FDYNX (-2.62). GFFFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.53 vs. FDYNX (12.37).
| FDYNX | GFFFX | FDYNX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.40 | 385% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 0.40 | 385% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.202 | -0.999 | 321% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.9B | 336B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.62 | 2.94 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.68 | 45.91 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.37 | 14.53 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.48 | 121.87 | 233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers