Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDWM vs RECS
FDWM vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FDWM vs RECS
Fidelity Women's Leadership ETF
Price$24.57
Change+$0.23 (+0.94%)
Volume$666
Net Assets4.33M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$38.47
Change+$0.43 (+1.13%)
Volume$418.87K
Net Assets3.34B
FDWM vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDWM vs. RECS commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDWM is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.34B vs. FDWM (4.33M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FDWM: RECS (11.121) vs FDWM (7.174). FDWM was incepted earlier than RECS: FDWM (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FDWM (0.59). FDWM has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FDWM | RECS | FDWM / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 7.174 | 11.121 | 65% |
| Net Assets | 4.33M | 3.34B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.15 | 393% |
| Turnover | 59.00 | 49.00 | 120% |
| Yield | 0.56 | 0.64 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDWM | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDWM has been loosely correlated with VLTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDWM jumps, then VLTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDWM | 100% | N/A | ||
| VLTO - FDWM | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| DELL - FDWM | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| PINS - FDWM | 51% Loosely correlated | -10.15% | ||
| MLKN - FDWM | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| ATI - FDWM | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +1.13% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.91% | ||
More | ||||