FDUS
Price
$21.51
Change
+$0.12 (+0.56%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
756.78M
52 days until earnings call
MRCC
Price
$7.55
Change
-$0.01 (-0.13%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
163.8M
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDUS vs MRCC

Header iconFDUS vs MRCC Comparison
Open Charts FDUS vs MRCCBanner chart's image
Fidus Investment
Price$21.51
Change+$0.12 (+0.56%)
Volume$4.25K
Capitalization756.78M
Monroe Capital
Price$7.55
Change-$0.01 (-0.13%)
Volume$100
Capitalization163.8M
FDUS vs MRCC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FDUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDUS vs. MRCC commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDUS is a StrongBuy and MRCC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FDUS: $21.39 vs. MRCC: $7.56)
Brand notoriety: FDUS and MRCC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDUS: 131% vs. MRCC: 63%
Market capitalization -- FDUS: $756.78M vs. MRCC: $163.8M
FDUS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $756.78M. MRCC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $163.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDUS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMRCC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FDUS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MRCC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDUS is a better buy in the long-term than MRCC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDUS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRCC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDUS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MRCC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRCC is a better buy in the short-term than FDUS.

Price Growth

FDUS (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.65% price change this week, while MRCC (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDUS is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

MRCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDUS($757M) has a higher market cap than MRCC($164M). MRCC has higher P/E ratio than FDUS: MRCC (84.00) vs FDUS (9.30). FDUS YTD gains are higher at: 7.269 vs. MRCC (-4.649). MRCC has less debt than FDUS: MRCC (209M) vs FDUS (529M). FDUS has higher revenues than MRCC: FDUS (93M) vs MRCC (7.14M).
FDUSMRCCFDUS / MRCC
Capitalization757M164M462%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.269-4.649-156%
P/E Ratio9.3084.0011%
Revenue93M7.14M1,303%
Total CashN/A5.32M-
Total Debt529M209M253%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDUS vs MRCC: Fundamental Ratings
FDUS
MRCC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1032
SMR RATING
1..100
3987
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
154
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDUS's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (4). This means that FDUS’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

FDUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (32). This means that FDUS’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

FDUS's SMR Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRCC (87). This means that FDUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

MRCC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as FDUS (51). This means that MRCC’s stock grew similarly to FDUS’s over the last 12 months.

MRCC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FDUS (15). This means that MRCC’s stock grew similarly to FDUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDUSMRCC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTUAF435.423.27
+0.76%
MTU Aero Engines AG
GIVSY23.65N/A
N/A
Grupo De Inversiones Suramericana S.A.
RSHPF1.15N/A
N/A
Irish Residential Properties REIT PLC
INNMF0.12N/A
-3.21%
Amplia Therapeutics Ltd.
PEMSF0.03N/A
-4.15%
Pacific Empire Minerals Corporation

FDUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDUS has been closely correlated with GBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDUS jumps, then GBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDUS
1D Price
Change %
FDUS100%
N/A
GBDC - FDUS
77%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
ARCC - FDUS
75%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
SLRC - FDUS
74%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
BCSF - FDUS
74%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
NMFC - FDUS
73%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More

MRCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRCC has been loosely correlated with FDUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRCC jumps, then FDUS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRCC
1D Price
Change %
MRCC100%
N/A
FDUS - MRCC
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BCSF - MRCC
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
TSLX - MRCC
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
MAIN - MRCC
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
BBDC - MRCC
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
More